On the monthly subject: "AI Regulation: Striking the Balance"
Jul. 16th, 2025 03:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I'm all for smart guardrails that help us harness AI safely without suffocating innovation. Now, the US has been highly reactive (with over 550 AI‑related bills in 45 states) but lacks cohesive federal direction. Meanwhile, the EU’s sweeping “AI Act” sets high standards but could overburden smaller innovators:
https://www.wired.com/story/plaintext-sam-altman-ai-regulation-trump/
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/14/12/645
https://time.com/7213096/uk-public-ai-law-poll/
So, how about:
Targeted regulation: Instead of painting AI with one brush, focus on where the risks lie, like bias in hiring tools or misuse in facial recognition.
Outcome over technology: Don’t regulate the tech itself; regulate its applications.
Enforceable rules: We need real teeth - clear accountability, not toothless charters.
Bottom line: What we need is fine‑tuned, enforceable, risk‑adaptive policies, so AI can thrive while protecting people.
Thoughts?
https://www.wired.com/story/plaintext-sam-altman-ai-regulation-trump/
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/14/12/645
https://time.com/7213096/uk-public-ai-law-poll/
So, how about:
Targeted regulation: Instead of painting AI with one brush, focus on where the risks lie, like bias in hiring tools or misuse in facial recognition.
Outcome over technology: Don’t regulate the tech itself; regulate its applications.
Enforceable rules: We need real teeth - clear accountability, not toothless charters.
Bottom line: What we need is fine‑tuned, enforceable, risk‑adaptive policies, so AI can thrive while protecting people.
Thoughts?